home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: cliffy.lfwc.lockheed.com!news
- From: Ken Garlington <GarlingtonKE@lfwc.lockheed.com>
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.c++
- Subject: Re: C/C++ knocks the crap out of Ada
- Date: Thu, 29 Feb 1996 08:25:28 +0000
- Organization: Lockheed Martin Tactical Aircraft Systems
- Message-ID: <313562F8.22EC@lfwc.lockheed.com>
- References: <JSA.96Feb16135027@organon.com> <4gaa6l$8mk@post.gsfc.nasa.gov> <4gd94r$isu@mack.rt66.com> <1996Feb22.005518.13396@leeweyr.sccsi.com> <4gvrffINNlqo@anvil.ugrad.cs.ubc.ca>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: ub_998356_mtm7.lfwc.lockheed.com
- Mime-Version: 1.0
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0 (Macintosh; I; 68K)
-
- > C is governed by an ISO standard, which, if adhered to, lets a strictly
- > conforming program translated by a strictly conforming implementation yield
- > well-defined results.
- >
- > I don't think you can say the same for Ada or C++.
-
- Why do you think this for Ada? Do you believe that there is no Ada language standard
- (ISO 8652), that there is no method for determining if an implementation conforms to
- the standard (ACVC), that there are no implementations that can meet the standard
- (see the validation list), or what?
-